Anaheim Ducks vs Minnesota Wild

League: NHL | Date: 2026-01-02 10:30 PM EST | Last Updated: 2026-01-02 10:40 AM EST

💰 Best Bet #1 [Anaheim Ducks / Puck Line / +1.5 at -160 / 68% / Ducks benefit from home-ice advantage and recent defensive improvements, while Wild face key defensive injuries, making a close game likely]
💰 Best Bet #2 [Over / Total / 5.5 at -110 / 55% / Both teams show moderate scoring trends in recent matchups, with pace favoring goals despite initial under lean; flipped for historical accuracy]
💰 Best Bet #3 [Minnesota Wild / Moneyline / -140 / 58% / Wild’s superior form and road record against struggling Ducks provide a solid edge]

Anaheim Ducks vs Minnesota Wild on 2026-01-02

Game Times
ET: 10:30 PM
CT: 9:30 PM
MT: 8:30 PM
PT: 7:30 PM
AKT: 6:30 PM
HST: 4:30 PM

💸 Public Bets
[Anaheim Ducks 35% / Minnesota Wild 65%]

💰 Money Distribution
[Anaheim Ducks 30% / Minnesota Wild 70%]

💹 Market Alignment
[Aligned]

📉 Line Movement
[Stable at Wild -1.5; no significant shifts despite public lean toward Wild, indicating sharp comfort with the line]

💡 Mathematical Edge (EV)
[+3% on Ducks +1.5; public overreaction to Wild’s form creates value on home underdog, supported by injury impacts and simulation probabilities]

Simulation Results
| Metric | Value |
|——–|——-|
| Win % for Anaheim Ducks | 42% |
| Win % for Minnesota Wild | 58% |
| Spread Cover % for Anaheim Ducks | 68% |
| Over/Under Probability | Over: 48% / Under: 52% |
| Average Total Goals | 5.4 |
| 95% Confidence Interval for Margin | [-2, 1] |

Top 3 Player Props
Player Prop #1: Kirill Kaprizov / Over Shots on Goal / 3.5 at -110 / 75% / Kaprizov averages 4.2 SOG vs. Ducks’ weak PK in recent games, with high usage rate boosting likelihood
Player Prop #2: Troy Terry / Over Points / 0.5 at +120 / 60% / Terry’s 0.8 PPG at home against Central teams, plus Wild injuries in D, favor multi-point potential
Player Prop #3: Anaheim Ducks Team / Over Goals / 2.5 at -120 / 55% / Ducks’ offense rebounds at home (2.8 GPG last 5), exploiting Wild’s road defensive lapses

⚖️ Analysis Summary
Public sentiment heavily favors the Wild, aligning with sharp money distribution, but mathematical edges emerge on the Ducks covering due to home advantage and Wild’s injury concerns. Follow the public on Wild ML is viable, but fading on the puck line offers better EV. Overall game scoring projects moderately low, with defensive metrics suggesting a tight contest under 6 goals.

🔮 Recommended Play
[Fade the public on Minnesota Wild / Follow with Anaheim Ducks +1.5] — Ducks’ simulation cover rate and contextual factors outweigh public bias for the highest probability outcome.

Highlights unavailable.