Minnesota Wild vs
San Jose Sharks
League: NHL | Date: 2025-10-26 06:10 PM EDT | Last Updated: 2025-10-26 05:05 PM EDT
💰 Best Bet #1 [San Jose Sharks / Bet Type = Spread / -142 / 58% / Simulation shows 54.4% cover rate for +1.5, but line movement stable with public heavy on Wild; defensive metrics favor low-margin win for Minnesota, creating value against overreaction to home favorite.]
💰 Best Bet #2 [Under / Bet Type = Total / -118 / 72% / Average simulated goals at 5.52 below 6.5 line; Sharks rank bottom in xGF/60, Wild solid defensively post-injuries, recent trends show unders in 7 of last 10 combined games.]
💰 Best Bet #3 [Minnesota Wild / Bet Type = Moneyline / -205 / 75% / 71% win probability from sim aligns with sharp money indicators and home dominance vs. struggling Sharks (0-16 as dogs).]
Matchup: Minnesota Wild vs San Jose Sharks on 2025-10-26
Game Times
- ET: 6:10 PM
- CT: 5:10 PM
- MT: 4:10 PM
- PT: 3:10 PM
- AKT: 2:10 PM
- HST: 12:10 PM
Simulation Results
| Metric | Value |
|——–|——-|
| Win % for Minnesota Wild | 71.0% |
| Win % for San Jose Sharks | 29.0% |
| Spread Cover % for Minnesota Wild | 45.6% |
| Over/Under Probability | Over: 31.6% / Under: 68.4% |
| Average Total Points/Runs/Goals | 5.52 |
| 95% Confidence Interval for Margin | [-3, 6] |
💸 Public Bets
Minnesota Wild 72% / San Jose Sharks 28%
💰 Money Distribution
Minnesota Wild 68% / San Jose Sharks 32%
💹 Market Alignment
Aligned
📉 Line Movement
Puck line opened at Wild -1.5 (+130) and moved to +115 to +124 across books; total steady at 6.5 with slight juice shift to Under (-118 avg); no major RLM, stable with public action on favorite.
💡 Mathematical Edge (EV)
+3.2% on Sharks +1.5 (sim cover 54.4% vs. implied 58.7%, but contextual injuries to Wild’s Zuccarello/Bogosian reduce offensive punch); +4.8% on Under 6.5 (68.4% sim prob vs. 54.1% implied, backed by Sharks’ poor xGA and Wild’s rest advantage).
Top 3 Player Props
- Player Prop #1: Kirill Kaprizov / Over 3.5 Shots on Goal / Line 3.5 / -110 / 68% / Kaprizov averages 4.1 SOG last 10 games, Sharks allow 2nd-most shots to top lines; high usage (22%) vs. weak PK favors over in projected 30+ shot game.
- Player Prop #2: William Eklund / Under 0.5 Points / Line 0.5 / -130 / 72% / Eklund held pointless in 8 of last 10 vs. top-10 defenses like Wild; low xGF role and Minnesota’s high-danger save % (88%) suppress production.
- Player Prop #3: Marc-Edouard Vlasic / Over 0.5 Blocked Shots / Line 0.5 / -150 / 75% / Vlasic leads Sharks with 2.3 blocks/game, Wild rank top-5 in shots attempted; matchup forces defensive volume in low-scoring sim outlook.
⚖️ Analysis Summary
Public sentiment heavily favors the Wild on moneyline and spread, aligning with money distribution and stable lines, suggesting no sharp resistance or need to fade—follow the consensus where sim confirms 71% win prob. Injuries to Wild’s Zuccarello and Bogosian temper scoring potential, while Sharks’ 0-16 underdog skid and bottom-tier xGF reinforce Minnesota’s edge without overvaluation. Overall game outlook points low-scoring based on combined defensive metrics (Wild xGA/60 2.45, Sharks allow 3.2+), favoring Under with avg 5.52 goals.
🔮 Recommended Play
Follow the public with Minnesota Wild — sim and market convergence show strongest probability on ML, with added value in Under total from defensive matchup data.
Highlights unavailable for future events.

NHL