Or…

NHLNHL

Anaheim Ducks vs Detroit Red Wings
Oct 31, 2025
Bet 1 / Bet 2 / Bet 3
/ /
33.3%
1 / 3 Correct

Anaheim Ducks LogoAnaheim Ducks vs Detroit Red Wings LogoDetroit Red Wings

League: NHL | Date: 2025-10-31 10:10 PM EDT | Last Updated: 2025-10-31 06:21 PM EDT

Top 3 Overall Best Bets

💰 Best Bet #1 Detroit Red Wings / Spread / +1.5 at -230 / 71% Confidence / Simulation indicates a 71% cover rate for the Wings, exceeding the implied probability from current lines, supported by divergent market action where public favors Ducks heavily but money is closer, suggesting value on the underdog spread amid Detroit’s solid road defensive metrics.

💰 Best Bet #2 Under / Total / 6.5 at -110 / 61% Confidence / With an average simulated total of 6.0 goals and under probability at 61%, this leans low-scoring due to both teams’ bottom-third pace, strong goaltending from Dostal and expected starter for Detroit, and recent trends showing unders in similar matchups.

💰 Best Bet #3 Anaheim Ducks / Moneyline / -130 / 54% Confidence / Ducks hold a 54.3% win probability in simulations, aligning closely with implied odds, bolstered by home-ice advantage and recent form despite public overreaction; positive EV edge emerges from line stability and contextual factors like Detroit’s cross-country travel fatigue.

Simulation Results
| Metric | Value |
|——–|——-|
| Win % for Anaheim Ducks | 54.3% |
| Win % for Detroit Red Wings | 45.7% |
| Puck Line Cover % for Anaheim Ducks -1.5 | 29.0% |
| Puck Line Cover % for Detroit Red Wings +1.5 | 71.0% |
| Over 6.5 Probability | 39.0% |
| Under 6.5 Probability | 61.0% |
| Average Total Goals | 6.0 |
| 95% Confidence Interval for Margin (Ducks – Wings) | [-5, 5] |

Matchup: Anaheim Ducks vs Detroit Red Wings on 2025-10-31

Game Times
ET: 10:00 PM
CT: 9:00 PM
MT: 8:00 PM
PT: 7:00 PM
AKT: 6:00 PM
HST: 4:00 PM

💸 Public Bets
68% Ducks / 32% Red Wings

💰 Money Distribution
55% Ducks / 45% Red Wings

💹 Market Alignment
Divergent

📉 Line Movement
Line opened at Ducks -125 ML and has ticked to -130 across books like DraftKings and FanDuel, with puck line steady at Wings +1.5 -225; total firm at 6.5 with slight under movement on BetRivers variant at 6.

💡 Mathematical Edge (EV)
+2.5% on Wings +1.5 (simulation cover exceeds implied 69% probability); +3% on Under 6.5 (defensive xGA rates and goalie matchups support lower totals than public expectation).

Top 3 Player Props
Player Prop #1: Dylan Larkin / Over 3.5 Shots on Goal / 3.5 at -120 / 68% Confidence / Larkin averages 3.8 SOG per game this season with high usage on Detroit’s top line; against Anaheim’s middling shot suppression, his volume supports the over, especially in a projected even matchup where Wings generate 28-30 shots.
Player Prop #2: Alex DeBrincat / Over 0.5 Points / 0.5 at +110 / 62% Confidence / DeBrincat’s 0.45 points per game rate aligns with plus-money value; Ducks allow 3.2 goals per game at home, and his synergy with Larkin boosts scoring chances, with simulations showing 55% hit rate in similar spots.
Player Prop #3: Frank Vatrano / Under 0.5 Points / 0.5 at -130 / 65% Confidence / Vatrano’s recent form dips to 0.3 points per game without key linemates; Detroit’s top-pair defense limits high-danger chances (xGA/60 of 2.8), and injury concerns for Ducks’ depth reduce his opportunities in a low-total game.

⚖️ Analysis Summary
Public sentiment heavily backs the Ducks at 68%, but money distribution at 55% shows sharper divergence, indicating potential professional action on Detroit amid the line’s slight firming toward the favorite. This setup justifies fading the public on the spread, as simulations and xGA metrics (Ducks 2.9, Wings 2.7 per 60) point to a close contest rather than a blowout. Overall game scoring outlook favors the under, with both teams’ defensive structures and goalie saves (Dostal .915 SV%, Detroit tandem .910) projecting below the 6.5 total despite occasional power-play edges.

🔮 Recommended Play
Fade the public on Detroit Red Wings +1.5 — the mathematical probability of covering exceeds market pricing, driven by simulation edges and contextual travel fatigue for the Wings without invalidating their defensive resilience.

Highlights unavailable for future events.

Post ID: 7986