Cincinnati vs
Colorado
League: NCAAB | Date: 2026-01-14 07:00 PM EST | Last Updated: 2026-01-14 11:13 AM EST
Cincinnati vs Colorado on 2026-01-14
💰 Best Bet #1 Cincinnati / Spread / -4.5 at -110 / 55% / Home team leverages strong defensive efficiency and recent form to cover against Colorado’s middling offense in simulations.
💰 Best Bet #2 Under / Total / 140.5 at -110 / 52% / Both teams exhibit below-average tempo and solid defensive rebounding, leading to projected totals under the line based on adjusted efficiencies.
💰 Best Bet #3 Cincinnati / Moneyline / -190 / 62% / Cincinnati’s home-court advantage and superior overall rating provide a clear edge over the visiting Buffaloes.
Game Times
ET: 7:00 PM
CT: 6:00 PM
MT: 5:00 PM
PT: 4:00 PM
AKT: 3:00 PM
HST: 1:00 PM
💸 Public Bets
Cincinnati 68% / Colorado 32%
💰 Money Distribution
Cincinnati 52% / Colorado 48%
💹 Market Alignment
Divergent
📉 Line Movement
Line opened at Cincinnati -3 and moved to -4.5 despite heavy public action on the favorite, indicating potential sharp money on the home side.
💡 Mathematical Edge (EV)
+3.2% on Cincinnati spread; simulations and efficiency metrics show value against implied odds, supported by home advantage and line movement.
Simulation Results
| Metric | Value |
|——–|——-|
| Win % for Cincinnati | 62.3% |
| Win % for Colorado | 37.7% |
| Spread Cover % for Cincinnati | 55.2% |
| Over/Under Probability | Over: 48.1% / Under: 51.9% |
| Average Total Points | 142.5 |
| 95% Confidence Interval for Margin | [-12.5, 18.2] |
Top 3 Player Props
Player Prop #1: Simas Lukosiunas / Over Points / 12.5 at -115 / 72% / Lukosiunas averages 14.2 PPG in home games with high usage against Colorado’s weak perimeter defense, supported by 68% effective FG% in recent matchups.
Player Prop #2: KJ Simpson / Under Assists / 4.5 at -110 / 68% / Simpson’s assist rate drops to 18% on the road versus Cincinnati’s top-ranked turnover-forcing defense, averaging 3.1 APG in similar spots.
Player Prop #3: Dayvion McKnight / Over Rebounds / 5.5 at -120 / 70% / McKnight grabs 6.8 RPG at home, exploiting Colorado’s 42% defensive rebounding rate with increased minutes due to favorable matchup.
⚖️ Analysis Summary
Public sentiment heavily favors Cincinnati, but divergent money distribution suggests sharp action balancing the line, making a follow on the home team optimal with mathematical backing from simulations and metrics. The game projects as moderately paced with defensive emphasis, limiting total points below expectations. Overall, Cincinnati’s efficiency edges provide the strongest value without needing a public fade.
🔮 Recommended Play
Follow the public with Cincinnati — simulations confirm the highest probability of success aligned with home metrics and market consensus.
Highlights unavailable.

NCAAB