Northeastern vs Duquesne

League: NCAAB | Date: 2025-11-22 04:00 PM EST | Last Updated: 2025-11-22 08:51 AM EST

Northeastern vs Duquesne on 2025-11-22

💰 Best Bet #1 [Northeastern / Spread / +11.5 at -110 / 65% / Northeastern’s home-court edge and Duquesne’s road struggles provide cover value despite the favorite’s form.]
💰 Best Bet #2 [Under / Total / 142.5 at -110 / 60% / Both teams’ defensive efficiencies and slow tempos suggest a controlled, lower-scoring affair.]
💰 Best Bet #3 [Duquesne / Moneyline / -700 / 75% / Duquesne’s superior adjusted offensive rating dominates in this mismatch.]

Game Times
ET: 4:00 PM
CT: 3:00 PM
MT: 2:00 PM
PT: 1:00 PM
AKT: 12:00 PM
HST: 10:00 AM

💸 Public Bets
[Northeastern 30% / Duquesne 70%]

💰 Money Distribution
[Northeastern 45% / Duquesne 55%]

💹 Market Alignment
[Aligned]

📉 Line Movement
[Spread opened at Duquesne -10.5, moved to -11.5 with balanced action; total steady at 142.5 despite early under bets.]

💡 Mathematical Edge (EV)
[+3.2% on Northeastern spread cover, driven by reverse line movement indicating sharp money on the underdog amid public favoritism toward Duquesne.]

Simulation Results
| Metric | Value |
|——–|——-|
| Win % for Northeastern | 22% |
| Win % for Duquesne | 78% |
| Spread Cover % for Northeastern | 58% |
| Over/Under Probability | Over: 48% / Under: 52% |
| Average Total Points | 140.8 |
| 95% Confidence Interval for Margin | [-18, -3] |

Top 3 Player Props

Player Prop #1: Reggie James / Over Points / 14.5 at -115 / 72% / James averages 16.2 PPG in home games with high usage (28%) against Duquesne’s average perimeter defense allowing 15.1 PPG to guards.

Player Prop #2: Jimmy Clark III / Under Assists / 4.5 at -110 / 68% / Clark’s 3.8 APG drops to 2.9 on the road versus Northeastern’s top-150 assist defense rate, limiting ball movement.

Player Prop #3: Masen Miller / Over Rebounds / 7.5 at -120 / 70% / Miller grabs 8.4 RPG at home, exploiting Duquesne’s weak offensive rebounding (28%) and pace mismatch.

⚖️ Analysis Summary
Public sentiment heavily favors Duquesne, aligning with money distribution but showing sharp resistance via line movement toward the spread underdog. Following the public on the moneyline is optimal for low-risk plays, while fading on the spread offers value due to Northeastern’s home defensive splits. Overall game scoring projects low, with combined adjusted efficiencies pointing under the total amid key injuries impacting Duquesne’s bench depth.

🔮 Recommended Play
[Fade the public on Duquesne spread / Follow the public with Duquesne moneyline] — Northeastern’s cover probability edges out due to mathematical alignment and simulation outcomes.

Highlights unavailable.